Monday, February 22, 2010

Review: "A SERIOUS MAN"


In the Old Testament, there's a book containing the story about a man named Job. Job is depicted as a good, decent, and faithful man. He loves his wife and children, he works hard, and regards God as the number one priority in his life. However, God and Satan have placed a wager questioning Job's true loyalty to God, where Satan believes if God removes his holy protection from Job, Job will spite God for all of his eventual suffering and prove his lack of faith.

As such, Job undergoes a series of highly unfortunate events: he loses his wealth, his wife and children are all killed, and Job's physical health deteriorates rapidly. Despite being a righteous and humble man, Job wonders why on earth God chose to pick on him.

That's pretty much the dilemma that Jewish professor and family man Larry Gopnik faces in the latest film from the Oscar-winning Coen Brothers, A Serious Man. Proving once again that there aren't many to match the Coens' talents in crafting dark, introspective, and wonderfully weird cinematic tales, A Serious Man is one part drama, one part black comedy, and a whole lotta meshugas.

In 1967 suburban Minneapolis, Larry Gopnik (stage actor Michael Stuhlbarg) is a Jewish professor of physics at a local university, a true mensch, and patiently awaiting his tenure. However, as of late, Larry's been going through a lot of inconveniences both big and small. His daughter Sarah (Jessica McManus) seems to only care about washing her hair while also stealing money to fund a nosejob; his 13-year-old son Danny (Aaron Wolff) is approaching his bar mitzvah, and is a habitual pot smoker. Larry's brother Arthur (Richard Kind) has been crashing at Larry's house for months while trying to formulate the ultimate equation for being successful at gambling. And Larry's wife Judith (Sari Lennick) wants to get a divorce, as she's fallen in love with family friend and recent widower Sy Ableman (Fred Melamed).

Not only does this romantic revelation force Larry and Arthur to move into a motel, but Larry also is facing a lawsuit from the father of a student who tried to bribe Larry into giving the boy a better grade. His bank accounts empty, and anonymous defamatory letters threatening his chances at tenure, Larry is at the end of his rope, and tries to consult the wisdom of three different rabbis and ask what he's done to anger God.

In their long and unique career, the Coen Brothers haven't had a project as personal and intimate as A Serious Man. Having grown up in the Jewish faith in suburban Minneapolis during the 1960s, the siblings have clearly made Larry's story as a true labor of love: a character study and a look at how one falls back on faith when the chips are down, even those fallen chips are of Job-like proportions.

But our connection with this poor schmuck would be bubkes if it weren't for the terrific performance of Michael Stuhlbarg. A New York thespian mostly known for his Tony-nominated stage work, Stuhlbarg takes his role and nails it down perfectly. As the cinematic gods heap more and more misfortune on Larry, we feel his annoyance, anguish, and pain. It's a sublime performance that should easily open the door for more work in movies.

However, in true Coen fashion, this film may not be for everyone. Like many of their past works, A Serious Man is rather bleak, and despite some subtly funny/amusing moments, there's not much catharsis to be taken from the story. In fact, it can be rather pessimistic, though it may strike a chord with viewers who may have the same spiritual questions and dilemmas as Larry.

Also, there are a lot of references to Jewish tradition, religion, and language that many confuse the more gentile moviegoers. Luckily, such elements don't incapacitate the viewers' ability to understand the story, and it may even interest them to learn more about Yiddish and what the hell everyone was talking about.

In essence, this a Coen film, through and through. It relishes in its inherent weirdness and peculiarities, and everything is open to interpretation (from the opening prologue set in the early 20th century, to the abrupt ending that abandons newly loosened strings in the narrative). But A Serious Man is a superbly executed film in how it poses truly existential questions about faith, misfortune, and that classic-yet-never-answered query: "Why do bad things happen to good people?" Of course, as in real life, the film never gets around to answering it. Oy vey.

Letter Grade: "B+"

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Review: "PRECIOUS"


We all have our fair share of problems. We all face our own personal inequities and inconveniences, be they mild or severe. But many of us have it easier than we think, despite our constant complaining, and we fail to realize that there are plenty of people out there who have it a lot worse than us. People who suffer greatly in ways that we can't imagine, and yet trudge through their lives as if it was business as usual.

Claireece "Precious" Jones is one such individual. An illiterate, morbidly obese African-American teenager from 1987 Harlem, Precious lives with her monstrous, abusive, and domineering mother Mary, who treats her like a slave. Precious was also twice raped and impregnated by her father and Mary's boyfriend. Her first child was born with Down Syndrome, and the revelation of her second pregnancy has Precious kicked out of her high school. Precious' only escape from her cruel existence is fantasizing of a glamorous life as a celebrity.

Still feel like complaining about your feeble problems?

Regardless, there's no question that director Lee Daniels' adaptation of the novel by Ramona "Sapphire" Lofton is a tremendously powerful, raw, and ultimately uplifting work of art benefiting from superb direction and two powerhouse lead performances.

From the very beginning, Precious (newcomer Gabourey Sidibe) has suffered a thankless, horrific life. When we enter her Section 8 apartment in the Harlem projects, we become witnesses to true domestic hell. Her mother Mary (Mo'Nique) is a brutal, slovenly, tyrannical welfare-queen who orders Precious around like a servant. Hurling demeaning insults at her daughter, Mary regards Precious with utter disdain.

School life isn't any easier. Precious is unable to read, and seems to have no real future. After being expelled from her public high school when it's discovered that she's pregnant again, Precious is referred to an alternative high school, where there's hope that Precious may have a fighting chance to change her life. It's there that Precious meets her new teacher, Ms. Rain (Paula Patton), whose encouraging, kind, and caring nature gives Precious hope that she can free herself from her harsh life and cruel mother.

By far, Precious is one of the bleakest films I've ever watched. Though it takes the form of a Cinderella-style story, there's no usual Hollywood schmaltz or pitfalls common in movies featuring disadvantaged black protagonists (such as the "mighty whitey" Caucasian who arrives to help the main character out). Director Lee Daniels keeps the film grounded in reality, and its authenticity is supplemented by a slew of terrific performances.

In her acting debut, Gabourey Sidibe is a true revelation. Though Precious maintains a mostly emotionless physical facade, her pain and suffering is apparent. Sidibe creates a truly moving, sympathetic character with whom the audience connects with from start to finish. Paula Patton is wonderful as Precious' loving teacher, and a shockingly glammed-down Mariah Carey does a fine job as Precious' social worker (a surprising reversal from her awful performance in 2001's much-ridiculed Glitter).

But if there's one performance here that's deserving of any accolades it's given, it's that of comedienne Mo'Nique as Mary Jones. Now, I've never been a fan of Mo'Nique's comedic style. I've always found her to be grating, obnoxious, and stereotypical in her many lowbrow film and TV performances. But my opinion of her talents were changed for the better after viewing her turn as the ultimate domestic monster. Yet despite the negative qualities of the character, Mary is a completely three-dimensional character with at least some humanity buried underneath her cruel exterior.

A problem that Hollywood's usually faced with is the tendency to make films easy for the audience to swallow. They present the unrealistic notion that there's always a happy ending involved, even when they try to be as realistic as possible. But while Precious never goes down that route, it still presents the possibility that there's hope for us all, because, as the opening title card states, everything is a gift of the universe. A harrowing, heartbreaking, but ultimately uplifting experience, Precious is one of the best films of 2009, and a terrific testament to perseverance and the power of the human spirit.

Letter Grade: "A"

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

The Best of 2009

Alas, yet another year has come and gone, and with it came a plethora of movies both good and bad. Some were instant classics that deserved Oscar-worthy praise, and some were so bad that you wanted to shit yourself. Here's what I considered to be the best (and worst) of the year 2009.

BEST MALE PERFORMANCES OF 2009
1. Christoph Waltz as "Col. Hans Landa" in Inglourious Basterds
2. Jeff Bridges as "Bad Blake" in Crazy Heart
3. George Clooney as "Ryan Bingham" in Up in the Air
4. Jeremy Renner as "Sgt. William James" in The Hurt Locker
5. Sharlto Copley as "Wikus van de Merwe" in District 9
6. Nicolas Cage as "Sgt. Terrence McDonagh" in Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans
7. Morgan Freeman as "Nelson Mandela" in Invictus
8. Joseph Gordon-Levitt as "Tom Hansen" in (500) Days of Summer
9. Tobey Maguire as "Lt. Sam Cahill" in Brothers
10. Robin Williams as "Lance Clayton" in World's Greatest Dad

(Honorable mentions: Zach Galifianakis as "Alan" in The Hangover; Max Records as "Max" in Where the Wild Things Are; Jackie Earle Haley as "Rorschach" in Watchmen)

BEST FEMALE PERFORMANCES OF 2009
1. Mo'Nique as "Mary Jones" in Precious
2. Meryl Streep as "Julia Child" in Julie and Julia
3. Sandra Bullock as "Leigh Anne Tuohy" in The Blind Side
4. Gabourey Sidibe as "Precious Jones" in Precious
5. Zooey Deschanel as "Summer Finn" in (500) Days of Summer
6. Anna Kendrick as "Natalie Keener" in Up in the Air
7. Vera Farmiga as "Alex Goran" in Up in the Air
8. Bailee Madison as "Isabel Cahill" in Brothers
9. Zoe Saldana as "Neytiri" in Avatar
10. Melanie Laurent as "Shoshanna Dreyfus" in Inglourious Basterds

(Honorable mentions: Carey Mulligan as "Jenny Miller" in An Education; Lorna Raver as "Sylvia Ganush" in Drag Me To Hell; Natalie Portman as "Grace Cahill" in Brothers)

WORST PERFORMANCES OF 2009
1. Jack Black as "Zed" in Year One
2. Megan Fox as "Mikaela Banes" in Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
3. Will Ferrell as "Rick Marshall" in Land of the Lost
4. Channing Tatum as "Duke" in G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra
5. Michael Cera as "Oh" in Year One
6. Marlon Wayans as "Ripcord" in G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra
7. Taylor Kitsch as "Gambit" in X-Men Origins: Wolverine
8. Dennis Quaid as "Hawk" in G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra
9. Malin Akerman as "Silk Spectre" in Watchmen
10. Sandra Bullock as "Mary Horowitz" in All About Steve

(Honorable mentions: Kevin James as "Paul Blart" in Paul Blart: Mall Cop; Matthew Goode as "Ozymandias" in Watchmen; Jeremy Piven as "Don Ready" in The Goods)

FUNNIEST PERFORMANCES OF 2009
1. Zach Galfianakis as "Alan" in The Hangover
2. Ed Helms as "Stu" in The Hangover
3. Brad Pitt as "Lt. Aldo Raine" in Inglourious Basterds
4. Matt Damon as "Mark Whitacre" in The Informant!
5. Karl Urban as "Leonard McCoy" in Star Trek
6. Paul Rudd as "Peter Klaven" in I Love You, Man
7. Seth Rogen as "Ronnie Barnhardt" in Observe and Report
8. Robert Downey, Jr. as "Sherlock Holmes" in Sherlock Holmes
9. Woody Harrelson as "Tallahassee" in Zombieland
10. Sacha Baron Cohen as "Bruno" in Bruno

(Honorable mentions: Bradley Cooper as "Phil" in The Hangover; Seth Rogen as "B.O.B." in Monsters vs. Aliens; Ryan Reynolds as "Wade Wilson" in X-Men Origins: Wolverine)

BEST CAMEOS OF 2009
1. Leonard Nimoy as "Spock Prime" in Star Trek
2. Bill Murray as "Bill Murray" in Zombieland
3. Ryan Reynolds as "Wade Wilson" in X-Men Origins: Wolverine (come on, he was only in the damn movie for five minutes)
4. Ron Paul as "Ron Paul" in Bruno
5. Mike Myers as "Gen. Ed Fenech" in Inglourious Basterds
6. Rob Riggle as "Officer Franklin" in The Hangover
7. Arnold Schwarzenegger as "T-800" in Terminator Salvation
8. Eminem as "Eminem" in Funny People
9. Rainn Wilson as "Professor Colan" in Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
10. Mike Tyson as "Mike Tyson" in The Hangover


BEST ENSEMBLE CAST OF 2009
Inglourious Basterds (Brad Pitt, Eli Roth, Til Schweiger, B.J. Novak, Christoph Waltz, Melanie Laurent, Diane Kruger, Daniel Bruhl, Gedeon Burkhard, Michael Fassbender, Jacky Ido, Julie Dreyfus, Martin Wuttke, Mike Myers)

BREAKOUT STARS OF 2009
1. Gabourey Sidibe (Precious)
2. Christoph Waltz (Inglourious Basterds)
3. Michael Stuhlbarg (A Serious Man)
4. Zach Galifianakis (The Hangover, Up in the Air)
5. Chris Pine (Star Trek)
6. Sharlto Copley (District 9)
7. Sam Worthington (Terminator Salvation, Avatar)
8. Max Records (Where the Wild Things Are)
9. Carey Mulligan (An Education, Brothers, Public Enemies)
10. Jesse Eisenberg (Adventureland, Zombieland)

(Honorable mentions: Zachary Quinto, Star Trek; Ed Helms, The Hangover; Lorna Raver, Drag Me To Hell)

BEST DIRECTORS OF 2009
1. Kathryn Bigelow (The Hurt Locker)
2. Quentin Tarantino (Inglourious Basterds)
3. Jason Reitman (Up in the Air)
4. Spike Jonze (Where the Wild Things Are)
5. Lee Daniels (Precious)
6. Werner Herzog (Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans)
7. Clint Eastwood (Invictus)
8. J.J. Abrams (Star Trek)
9. Neill Blomkamp (District 9)
10. Bobcat Goldthwait (World's Greatest Dad)

(Honorable mentions: James Cameron, Avatar; Wes Anderson, Fantastic Mr. Fox; Sam Raimi, Drag Me To Hell)

BEST ACTION SEQUENCES OF 2009
1. The Final Battle (Avatar)
2. Destruction of the Theater (Inglourious Basterds)
3. Kirk and Sulu vs. Romulans/Drill Battle (Star Trek)
4. Taming of the Banshee (Avatar)
5. The Enterprise vs. The Narada (Star Trek)
6. Guggenheim Gunfight (The International)
7. Graveyard Mud-Fight (Drag Me To Hell)
8. Wikus and Christopher infiltrate MNU (District 9)
9. Dumbledore vs. Inferi (Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince)
10. Snake Eyes vs. Storm Shadow (G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra)

(Honorable mentions: Wikus and the Battlesuit (District 9); Wade vs. Nigerian mercenaries, X-Men Origins: Wolverine; Battle on Tower Bridge, Sherlock Holmes)


WORST MOVIES OF 2009
1. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
2. Old Dogs
3. All About Steve
4. Year One
5. Amelia
6. Land of the Lost
7. G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra
8. The Ugly Truth
9. Halloween II
10. X-Men Origins: Wolverine

MOST "MEH" MOVIES OF 2009 (Not good or bad, but just... meh)
1. Extract
2. Bruno
3. The International
4. Funny People
5. Angels and Demons
6. Monsters vs. Aliens
7. Race to Witch Mountain
8. Terminator Salvation
9. Jennifer's Body
10. Taking Woodstock


BEST MOVIES OF 2009
1. Star Trek
2. Inglourious Basterds
3. Up in the Air
4. District 9
5. Where the Wild Things Are
6. Anvil! The Story of Anvil
7. The Hurt Locker
8. Drag Me To Hell
9. The Hangover
10. (500) Days of Summer

(Honorable mentions: Up; Invictus; Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans)

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Review: "(500) DAYS OF SUMMER"



If there's one film genre that I've come to detest in recent years, it's the romantic comedy. A victim of the same formula dressed up as something "new" or "original", the genre lost my respect when it seemed that no filmmaker would be daring and disregard the same old story:

1. Boy meets girl.
2. Boy and girl develop a cordial friendship.
3. Boy and girl discover that they just LOVE each other.
4. Boy and girl happily begin a romantic relationship.
5. Montage #1 (Happy).
6. Tensions gradually begin to build, be it because of a perceived slight, a former lover entering the picture, or an argument blown out of proportion.
7. Boy and girl break up.
8. Montage #2 (Sad).
9. Thanks to the help/sound advice of their wacky/wise-beyond-their-years friends, boy and girl rediscover how they're meant for each other.
10. Boy and girl reunite. Credits roll.

It just gets tiring. Not only does this formula remain stale, but it can present a non-realistic depiction of relationships, and it never presents the possibility that not all romances are meant to be. How relieved I was, then, when I happened upon (500) Days of Summer, a brilliant, delightful, and wholly original anti-romance, bolstered by a terrific script, taut direction, a wonderfully unconventional non-linear storytelling device, and completely engaging performances by the two leads.

Tom Hansen (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) is a text-writer for a Los Angeles greeting card company, but his heart and passion is for architecture. It's during a meeting at work that he discovers his boss' new assistant, Summer Finn (Zooey Deschanel). Instantly smitten, Tom (following a drunken karaoke session), lets slip that he's attracted to Summer. The attraction is revealed to be mutual, and over the following months, the two become close.

However, Summer makes it clear that she doesn't believe in love or the whole boyfriend/girlfriend dynamic. This obstacle proves to be a major obstacle for Tom, whose ideas of true love are not held by Summer.

Executed in a non-linear format where the story jumps back and forth from various days in Tom and Summer's 500-day relationship, (500) Days fabulously examines the highs and lows of a relationship, juxtaposing the pure bliss of puppy love with the devastating realities of rejection. It also studies in a non-cynical way about how fate and destiny may be entirely fictional concepts, and how the world instead operates purely on coincidence. The film is free of cliche or schmaltz, and yet it brims with a genuine sense of warmth, realism, and intimacy.

First-time feature director and acclaimed music video helmer Marc Webb, working from a wonderful script by Michael Weber and Scott Neustadter, effortlessly balances the emotions at play. We're not merely observers of Tom's story: we practically feel like we're involved. We feel his confusion, sadness, and frustration during his moments of heartbreak; we also feel his joy when he's on top of the world (best personified by quite possibly the most sublime musical number seen in a non-musical film, set to Hall & Oates' "You Make My Dreams").

Of course, the film would be nothing without its stars. Continuing to prove that he's one of the finest actors of his generation, Joseph Gordon-Levitt delivers a performance of a lifetime. Clearly having grown tremendously as an actor since his "3rd Rock from the Sun" and 10 Things I Hate About You days, Gordon-Levitt is superb as the lovesick romantic whose ideas of true love may not be entirely realistic.

Zooey Deschanel is terrific as the girl that Tom considers "The One". Charming, bright, and incredibly adorable, Deschanel gives a fully-fleshed performance so convincing and engaging that WE fall in love with her too.

So to be clear, (500) Days of Summer is NOT a love story. It IS a boy-meets-girl story, but that's pretty much where the similarities with conventional romance movies end. It's a thoughtful examination on the nature of love, destiny, and how some things in life just can't be explained. It reminds one that life can be full of sad endings, yet still have the potential for new beginnings. One of the best "romantic" films I've ever seen thanks to its uncoventional-yet-genuine storytelling (reminding one of classics like Annie Hall, Love Actually, and High Fidelity) and astounding work both on camera and off, you'll wish this Summer never ends.

Letter Grade: "A"

Monday, January 4, 2010

Review: "ANVIL! THE STORY OF ANVIL"



I'm a huge metal fan. Always have been, always will be. There's just something about the long hair, the outlandish costumes, the over-the-top machismo, the macabre lyrics, and the high intensity of the power chords that puts a big smile on my face. To me, bands like Black Sabbath, Metallica, Motorhead, Slayer, and Twisted Sister were more than just musicians: they were consummate showmen, doing more than just singing and playing instruments. They were the like the carnival act of the music world.

How mad I was at myself, then, that I had never heard of Anvil. A Canadian heavy metal band formed in 1978, Anvil was considered a seminal influence on greats like Lemmy Kilmister of Motorhead, Slash of Guns 'n Roses, Scott Ian of Anthrax, and Lars Ulrich of Metallica. However, unlike their '70s and '80s contemporaries, Anvil never experienced true superstardom, despite having cult popularity and legions of dedicated fans across the world.

Despite releasing twelve studio albums, for the last twenty years Anvil has mostly played at small-time venues, still rocking hard despite their relative obscurity. However, a second chance at hitting it big arrived, and is chronicled in Anvil! The Story of Anvil, a touching, intimate, funny, and incredibly inspirational rockumentary from British director Sacha Gervasi (who actually served as one of the band's roadies for three tours during the 1980s).

The film starts with archival footage of the 1984 Super Rock festival held in Japan, with headlining acts including Bon Jovi, Whitesnake, the Scorpions, and Anvil. An onscreen title states that all of the acts went on to sell millions of records... except for Anvil. The band never went on to the success they strived for, and in the present day, they live "normal" lives, playing bars and tiny venues at night for little money (though their hardcore fans still show up).

Having been friends since they were fourteen, lead singer/guitarist Steve "Lips" Kudlow and drummer Robb Reiner (no, not the director of the classic This is Spinal Tap, though some similarities can be drawn between the 1984 mockumentary and Anvil's story) made a pact to make it to the big time. Despite their mediocre success, the two remained together well into their fifties. They and their fellow band members have been going through financial difficulty, but still haven't given up on rocking hard.

Anvil! follows the band through a promising return to the limelight in a troubled European tour, money problems, a shaky production of their thirteenth album, and internal strife between Lips and Robb. But it's also a chronicle of human perserverance, chasing one's dreams, and never letting go of what you truly love. In a way, Anvil! is the non-fiction, music-themed answer to last year's The Wrestler, about the struggles of returning to one's glory days and true passions.

As the film progressed, I became more and more surprised at how I've never heard of Anvil. Several times throughout the movie, I caught myself banging my head to their songs (including their signature "Metal on Metal"). When the movie captures Anvil performing either in huge arenas or tiny bars, the cathartic joy on Kudlow and Reiner's faces says a million words: money or not, success or not, the presence of their loyal fans is all the reward they need.

Anvil! The Story of Anvil is a moving, uplifting, and highly entertaining look at an aging band's "never-say-die" attitude. The fans and the music are all that matter to them; it's what keeps them alive. At times hilarious, and at times incredibly heartbreaking (this reviewer became a little choked up a couple times throughout), but always inspirational, Anvil! The Story of Anvil not only goes to eleven, but it goes straight to your very soul.

Letter Grade: "A"

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Review: "SHERLOCK HOLMES"



A recent cinematic fad occurring the last several years has been the practice of the "reboot". Unlike the "remake" of a single movie (where the basic story remains while characters are changed slightly or significantly, i.e. Ocean's Eleven, King Kong, and practically every horror movie), a reboot takes an established franchise and starts anew, with a fresh beginning (such as Christopher Nolan's recent Batman films, the Daniel Craig James Bond reboot, and even the latest Star Trek film-- though it'd probably be more accurate to describe the latter as both a prequel AND an in-continuity reboot).

While some may balk at the idea of reimagining beloved characters in new and even drastic ways, the upside is that the "reboot" can overlook the stale direction the previous franchise eventually took, and start completely fresh, introducing the characters to a new generation while still maintaining the core roots of the original idea.

The latest addition to this trend is Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's legendary Victorian-era detective in director Guy Ritchie's stylish, fast-paced, and inventive Sherlock Holmes. A highly entertaining update on the famous sleuth, Holmes may add details to the character that may raise the eyebrows of purists, but such qualms are overlooked by two terrific lead performances.

London, circa. 1890's. Eccentric yet brilliant private detective Sherlock Holmes (Robert Downey Jr.) and his more reserved colleague/roommate Dr. John Watson (Jude Law) are the best sleuths in England, gaining both the respect and the ire of Scotland Yard for their unorthodox methods and consistent results. However, Sherlock believes that their partnership and friendship are being threatened by Watson's need to settle down, especially when he plans to propose to his girlfriend Mary (Kelly Reilly).

After the duo help capture murderous cult leader Lord Blackwood (Mark Strong), Watson prepares to move out of their flat, causing Holmes to become more reclusive than ever. However, their troubles are compounded after Blackwood's execution: the Satanic leader has apparently risen from his grave, inciting fear in the people of London, and is preparing to unleash unfathomable destruction on Parliament and, eventually, all of England.

As such, Holmes and Watson must put aside their differences and hunt down Blackwood before he kills millions, all while Sherlock contends with the return of a past romantic interest in the form of American Irene Adler (Rachel McAdams), whose allegiances may or not be in question.

As his previous Snatch and Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels have shown, Ritchie has an enormous flair for visual storytelling. His depiction of Victorian England is absolutely gorgeous, a bleak, Steampunk metropolis emulating the era's grubby urban landscape with amazing detail.

However, the biggest problem some may have with Sherlock Holmes is the newest reincarnation of the title character. While Sir Arthur's original version was an eccentric genius with an eye for obsessive detail, this version is Holmes-meets-action hero, adding elements barely touched upon in either the original books or the Basil Rathbone serials of the '30s (not to mention deleting the character's infamous addiction to opium): most notably, the fact that Sherlock is a highly proficient martial artist and pit fighter. But quite frankly, the method of how Holmes fights (imagining the battle beforehand move by move, after which it unfolds in a lightning-fast array of punches, kicks, and grapples) fits in perfectly with Holmes' meticulous nature. It also adds a layer of "bad ass" to a character who, being a seasoned detective, would naturally have effective combat abilities.

But such action-heavy sensibilities tend to derail the proceedings, becoming too over-the-top and even silly when it comes to the action, mayhem, and destruction, and the outrageousness feels like it belongs in another movie entirely.

Luckily, all that is tempered by the fabulous lead performance by Hollywood's Comeback King, Mr. Robert Downey Jr. Ever since reviving his career with last year's terrific Iron Man, earning a Best Supporting Oscar nomination for his riotous turn in Tropic Thunder, and reestablishing his dramatic skills with The Soloist, Downey continues his hot streak in his amazing recreation of the famous detective. Almost autistic and savant-like in his brilliant deduction skills, Downey's Holmes is a fabulous recreation of the character, embellished by Downey's natural charisma and snarky attitude.

Also highly entertaining is Jude Law as Holmes' best friend and irritable sidekick John Watson. Unlike Nigel Bruce's classic performances as the ultimate bumbling sidekick, this Watson is more than capable when it comes to fighting and saving Holmes' fat from the fire on multiple occasions. The "Odd Couple"-style bickering between Holmes and Watson is absolutely hilarious, and Downey and Law's rapport is wonderful. And though they're good in their respective roles, Mark Strong and the lovely Rachel McAdams aren't characterized enough to keep up with the lead performers.

As stated before, a reboot of a character as beloved and venerable as Sherlock Holmes can be a risky move. But such sentiments were made about Batman and James Bond before their respective reimaginations, and those fears were immediately allayed after the characters were given an amazingly fresh take. Thanks to highly imaginative direction by Ritchie, engaging performances by Robert Downey and Jude Law, fast-paced editing, a clever screenplay, and a catchy period-appropriate score by Hans Zimmer, Sherlock Holmes may very well be a solid rebirth for a classic franchise.

Letter Grade: "B+"

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Review: "AVATAR"



Over thirty years ago, a little film called Star Wars hit theaters. Made for $11 million (mind you, that's not very much, even in 1977 dollars) and viewed as a potential flop by its distributor 20th Century Fox, George Lucas' cinematic gamble not only became (at the time) the highest-grossing film in history, but was regarded as a film that revolutionized the industry as we knew it. It was touted as a breakthrough in special effects and high-concept storytelling, and generally cited as a transcendent, groundbreaking experience not unlike The Wizard of Oz and 2001: A Space Odyssey.

After its release, Star Wars not only became a pop culture phenomenon, but a benchmark for all amateur filmmakers to follow. One of them was a young truck driver named James Cameron. After seeing Lucas' masterpiece, Cameron promptly quit his job and set out to become of film director. Starting out as a miniature model maker and art director, Cameron made his directing debut for the low-budget B-movie Piranha II. But after crafting the cybernoir action film The Terminator, Cameron's career took off, following Lucas' trend of creating new innovative filmmaking technology, especially in the realm of special effects, helming The Abyss, Aliens, Terminator 2, and True Lies.

Then, in 1997, a certain movie about a famous British passenger liner prone to crashing into huge-ass icebergs was released, becoming the highest-grossing film in history (and still holds that title to this day), and earned 11 Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Director for Cameron. Though many cynics lambasted Titanic for its weak story and predictable love story, it nevertheless received raves for its mindblowing special effects and sound design.

But after Titanic's huge success, Cameron took a long break from moviemaking (save for a couple underwater documentaries), reportedly preparing for his dream project that's been in his head for decades, a project that Cameron had to wait for since he "needed the technology to catch up". Starting preproduction in 2004 and principal photography in 2006, the project, intially known as Project 880, was hyped as being the next Star Wars, a film that changed movies as we knew them.

Now, after years of waiting, Cameron's Avatar has hit theaters, and for the most part the rumors are true. A spine-tingling, highly imaginative, and jaw-droppingly beautiful work of technological genius, Avatar will truly change the landscape of cinema, just as Lucas' space opera did.

The year is 2154. The Earth's natural resources ravaged, humans have traveled to a far-off Earth-sized moon known as Pandora, mining the lush jungle planet for a valuable mineral. Unfortunately for the corporate powers-that-be, the native species of the planet, nine-foot-tall blue humanoids known as the Na'vi, aren't that willing to relocate from their sacred home. As such, the corporation's administrator Parker Selfridge (Giovanni Ribisi) employs former marines, lead by the gung-ho Colonel Quaritch (Stephen Lang), as mercenaries as a means to potentially force the Na'vi out.

But Selfridge is willing to go for diplomacy, utilizing the talents of Dr. Grace Augustine (Sigourney Weaver), a botanist in charge of the "Avatar" program, where human-Na'vi hybrids are created and controlled remotely by humans sharing genetic material with the Avatar. Since humans cannot breathe Pandora's atmosphere, the Avatars are used to interact with the Na'vi. Meanwhile, paralyzed marine Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) arrives at Pandora, where he's promised by Quaritch to get his mobility back if Sully, via an Avatar, infiltrates the Na'vi, learns their ways, and finds a way to get the blue-skinned aliens to relocate.

While escorting Grace and fellow scientist Norm (Joel Moore) in Avatar form in the Pandorian jungle, Jake is separated from his group, and eventually encounters Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), a Na'vi princess who almost kills Jake, but relents when she believes she sees a sign from the Na'vi goddess Eywa, telling her to bring Jake to her clan. Unaware of Jake's human origins or his mission, Neytiri convinces her clan and her father, chieftain Eytucan (Wes Studi), to teach Jake in the ways of the Na'vi. Despite feeding intel to Quaritch and Selfridge in the intervening months, Jake learns more about the customs and life of the Na'vi, coming to appreciate the species' connection to their planet. Jake begins to not only doubt the morality of his mission, but comes to regard the Na'vi as his own, as well as falling for Neytiri. As the military begins to move in on the Na'vi, Jake questions his allegiances, and begins to fight for the Na'vi rather than against them.

On the surface (well, OK, on all layers), the story is basically Dances With Wolves, only with blue aliens instead of Native Americans. In fact, the subtext is rather heavy, touching on subjects ranging from the past treatment of American Indians, the Vietnam War, the use of military forces as security detail (think Blackwater), and the oil controversies in the Middle East. And the story isn't anything new, having been touched upon in the aforementioned Kevin Costner movie, as well as the story of Pocahontas, and even the 1993 animated film Ferngully.

But if you think about it, the story of the first Star Wars film wasn't terribly original. Sure, the film as a whole is regarded as a triumph of storytelling, but Lucas' tale followed the usual blueprints for the Hero's Journey, gaining inspiration from comic books, movie serials, and Flash Gordon. And when you think about it further, you didn't really focus on Star Wars' story, but rather the exhilarating and cutting-edge technology on display.

With Avatar, it's no different. Though Cameron may be infamous for his perfectionism and his arrogance (watch his acceptance speech for his Best Director Oscar win in 1998, and you'll see why the latter is so true), his innovative contribution to the world of CGI and technological wizardry is never in doubt. Cameron reportedly helped develop new technology specifically for Avatar, including improved 3D cameras, more advanced motion-capture tech, and stereoscopic filmmaking techniques. And brother, the results are nothing short of heavenly. The richly envisioned world of Pandora is probably the closest we'll get to visiting another planet.

Here, Cameron's perfectionism and eye for detail shows: his Pandora is meticulously detailed to the smallest leaf and tiniest insect. Despite being produced by computer graphics, Pandora breathes with palpable life, a wonderous world with floating mountains, gigantic trees, gorgeous waterfalls that put those of the Amazon to shame, and jungles that seem ALIVE. It also helped that my screening was at a three-story-tall IMAX theater, so I felt like I was actually IN Pandora.

The motion-capture technology was no small potatoes, either. Popularized by Andy Serkis' performance as Gollum in the Lord of the Rings series, this filmmaking practice has improved by leaps and bounds, and here's no exception. As a part of Cameron's exclusively-made technology, 95% of the CGI Na'vi characters' performances were translated from the original live actors' performances, including their facial movement and expressions. The results are truly astounding to behold, the photorealism of both the alien creatures and the Pandorian environment meshing seamlessly with the live-action characters.

And those action sequences! I've seen great battle scenes before, but this set the bar as high as possible. The Na'vi are like alien Tarzans, gliding through the jungle with amazing fluidity. When they mount their flying lizard-like creatures (called Banshees), the aliens tear through the sky, their aerial maneuvers as cinematically jaw-dropping as the X-Wings attacking the Death Star in Star Wars. And the climactic battle scene between the Na'vi and the human military forces is amongst the most stunning war sequences in film history. Mere words cannot describe the sheer visual magic on display.

And even though the CGI is the true star here, Avatar's performances thankfully range from decent to terrific. After stealing the show from Christian Bale in this May's Terminator Salvation, Sam Worthington is believable and sympathetic in his performance of a man torn between two races. Sigourney Weaver also delivers a solid turn as the kindhearted scientist looking after the Na'vi's best interests, and Stephen Lang has fun chewing the scenery as the brutal marine colonel itching to wipe out the "blue savages" (though his role pretty much embodies every cinematic military stereotype possible). But it's Zoe Saldana's fabulous motion-capture performance as the Na'vi warrior princess that steals the show, emotional and absorbing, but also creating one of the most badass women warriors of late.

Some may regard Avatar's story reeking of liberal, anti-imperalist, anti-war thematic material, and to a degree, it does. But it's not necessarily a bad thing: Cameron explores the balance of spirituality and biology, best personified by Weaver's scientist character, who's unwilling to believe that the network-like connection between the Na'vi and their world is religious in nature rather than biological (one of many allegories to the Native Americans and their relationship to the Earth). The spiritual messages of Avatar are surprisingly potent, and the parallels to human's real-life treatment of Mother Earth ring true.

The advertisements and promotional material have touted Avatar as the latest evolution of cinema. After viewing this marvelous work of art, I realized that these claims were not mere hyperbole. It's a mix of spirituality, cathartic escapism, and state-of-the-art filmmaking skyrocketed to the nth degree. Avatar is a reminder of the power of imagination, and though he may or may not be the "King of the World" that he believes himself to be, there's no denying that James Cameron's imagination has brought us to a world that we would never bring ourselves to leave. A joyous, absorbing, tremendously exciting adventure, Avatar is a welcome sign that the movies still have the power to enlighten, engage, and most importantly, entertain.

Letter Grade: "A-"